Date: 2012-05-09 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuranar.livejournal.com
Ugh...

I only skimmed the article, but I got the gist. The comments are a sinkhole. And I was only in THERE because the article talked about F-22s and F-35s and I have to say - they WEREN'T. They were F-18s, plus a much larger fictionalized hovering craft vaguely similar to the F-35. And it's good they were F-18s, because those are Navy aircraft and are what actually belong on an aircraft carrier.

... Wow. That was a random sort of rant.

Date: 2012-05-10 12:30 am (UTC)
northernwalker: (Default)
From: [personal profile] northernwalker
Eh, it makes sense. There are enough loonies out there who think the government is tracking them by satellite, microchipping them, etc., that signing up to help out with a movie where there's a floating agency that doesn't seem to answer to anyone wouldn't be a bright move.

Date: 2012-05-10 01:20 am (UTC)
ext_18053: (mckay zelenka)
From: [identity profile] djarum99.livejournal.com
But...they were OK with Ironman's dogfight with F-whatevers? Because of the lack of ambiguity, I'm assuming and...well.

Profile

impulsereader: (Default)
impulsereader

July 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
282930 31   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 21st, 2026 04:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios