(no subject)
May. 28th, 2012 01:35 pmSo now I am Learning All About Cricket.
Is it OOC of Sherlock to be a decent bowler?
ETA - I have no idea what this means, but I'm having fun trying to puzzle it out...
The ball following a front foot no-ball will be a free-hit for the batsman, whereby he is safe from losing his wicket except for being run-out.
Edited again - sneering Mycroft aside, do we think the boys actually call their mother Mummy? as adults? I'm not sure I can make myself do that.
Is it OOC of Sherlock to be a decent bowler?
ETA - I have no idea what this means, but I'm having fun trying to puzzle it out...
The ball following a front foot no-ball will be a free-hit for the batsman, whereby he is safe from losing his wicket except for being run-out.
Edited again - sneering Mycroft aside, do we think the boys actually call their mother Mummy? as adults? I'm not sure I can make myself do that.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-29 06:05 pm (UTC)Yeah, he's not a team player. Solitary sports would appeal to him much more, but I think he probably had to pick up some skills along the way. I think accurate throwing is a skill that would serve him well in a lot of areas and just coincidentally he's a good bowler because of it (though he is frequently called for chucking) and gets recruited because you need 11 people per team and they always need more people, at least in my specific circumstances.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 05:09 pm (UTC)Cricket has such a long history. Especially where people own estates: House vs Village matches or Family vs Staff were traditionally something of a fixture.
Even some all-girls' private schools have cricket on the "Games" curriculum, let alone the boys' schools. Just FYI.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-13 11:03 pm (UTC)