It isn't the Coat, it's the Cumberbatch.
Jul. 26th, 2012 12:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If you can find it, go ahead and buy the Coat. Get it tailored to fit you perfectly. It won't help.
Over the last week I saw Frankenstein three times. The sequence in which I viewed the two versions is particularly germane to this discussion.
I saw, in sequence, CumberCreature - CumberVictor - CumberCreature.
After I saw the two different versions in one evening I wrote to quarryquest something along the lines of, 'I need some new television. I've been watching too much Benedict when I spend an entire two hours thinking, "Oooooooooo, Sherlock is playing a much better Victor than Johnny Lee Miller. He's also doing it in a really great series of Coats!"'
So, upon this evening's viewing when I was able to revisit the first version I'd seen armed with knowledge of the second, I discovered that Victor is given only two Coats - one near the end of the first half and another near the end of the play.
When I was watching Benedict play Victor, I was experiencing these two Coats as a completely separate character on stage, I really was - no joke. I was watching Victor and the Coat do a number on the Creature emotionally. The Coat packs a mean punch until it's reduced to pointing its gun, completely unable to fire it to kill its own Creation.
Now, before this evening when I was forced to pay some attention to Miller's Victor out of sheer boredom (guys, I'm trying not to be harsh by not really addressing the issue, but this actor made some real non-choices when playing Victor) I would have just assumed that I noted the Coat because it was Benedict and I'm used to taking note of the Coat where he is concerned. Not so. No movement. No personality. Nothing.
It's got to be the same coat. It had to have been tailored to each of these two actors by the same person.
Conclusion: Cumberbatch knows how to work the Coat - any Coat.
Over the last week I saw Frankenstein three times. The sequence in which I viewed the two versions is particularly germane to this discussion.
I saw, in sequence, CumberCreature - CumberVictor - CumberCreature.
After I saw the two different versions in one evening I wrote to quarryquest something along the lines of, 'I need some new television. I've been watching too much Benedict when I spend an entire two hours thinking, "Oooooooooo, Sherlock is playing a much better Victor than Johnny Lee Miller. He's also doing it in a really great series of Coats!"'
So, upon this evening's viewing when I was able to revisit the first version I'd seen armed with knowledge of the second, I discovered that Victor is given only two Coats - one near the end of the first half and another near the end of the play.
When I was watching Benedict play Victor, I was experiencing these two Coats as a completely separate character on stage, I really was - no joke. I was watching Victor and the Coat do a number on the Creature emotionally. The Coat packs a mean punch until it's reduced to pointing its gun, completely unable to fire it to kill its own Creation.
Now, before this evening when I was forced to pay some attention to Miller's Victor out of sheer boredom (guys, I'm trying not to be harsh by not really addressing the issue, but this actor made some real non-choices when playing Victor) I would have just assumed that I noted the Coat because it was Benedict and I'm used to taking note of the Coat where he is concerned. Not so. No movement. No personality. Nothing.
It's got to be the same coat. It had to have been tailored to each of these two actors by the same person.
Conclusion: Cumberbatch knows how to work the Coat - any Coat.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 12:06 pm (UTC)Benedict is gorgeous, of course; a little too gorgeous for us mere mortals, though. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 12:13 pm (UTC)I first started hearing about it about a month ago when I started seeing mentions of it popping up on my flist. I was confused at first because I thought it was a current live production. When I saw what it actually was I was a bit 'ho hum' about it, but then everyone started talking about it and I was assailed from all sides. Finally, when one of my LJ friends who doesn't even watch Sherlock posted a mini review; and, to boot, the little arty theater which we subscribe to here announced Frankenstein as part of the next season, I threw up my hands and did a quick google. I found it was playing at my local arty movie theater.
At fandom night a ton of people had already seen it in theaters, so they seem to do it periodically.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-26 05:10 pm (UTC)I listened to an interview with him, and it turns out he was the one who came up with the idea of putting the red stitching around the lapel buttonhole. Seems that's a thing people who buy posh clothes do -- personalize them a bit. I think it's a brilliant touch.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 02:58 am (UTC)I agree. If I ever take up being posh, I will be sure to do the same.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 10:42 pm (UTC)*considers her own bum*
*considers what she has just typed*
*types out an honest assessment of the possibilities of her bum proving posh*
*decides to delete honest assessment*
*considers seriously how much fun she has been having since beginning this journal and having the opportunity to type things like, *considers her own bum**
*smiles madly*
no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 11:44 pm (UTC)In the final Coat, the wedding coat with ankle-length tails, CB ends up on a bed with his bum in the air - white pants framed by blue tails - filmed from directly above. It's a minute and a half of Benedict's bum perfectly highlighted and framed - completely unintentionally. It is the height of ridiculousness.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-27 11:50 pm (UTC)But speaking of context, is it true as the monster he's buck naked on stage for 15 minutes?
no subject
Date: 2012-07-28 12:29 am (UTC)*disclaimer* He's honestly an extremely talented stage actor. Even when fully clothed.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-28 12:35 am (UTC)Of course he's a great actor. But...bow-bow-chicka-wow-wow nevertheless.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-03 06:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-03 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-04 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-04 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-08-04 12:41 pm (UTC)